Incident review
Organize the timeline, account records, and information available after a suspected digital asset incident.
Discuss your situation
Cyber Beacon intelligence
Digital asset investigations.
A careful review can help bring structure to a complex digital asset incident. We organize available records, explain limitations, and outline practical next steps.
Areas of support
A clear picture of the available evidence.
Each matter is different. Scope and possible next steps depend on the records and circumstances.
Blockchain analysis
Review relevant public transaction activity and document what the available data can and cannot establish.
Discuss your situationEvidence organization
Bring transaction references, communications, and supporting records together in a clear, reviewable format.
Discuss your situationA measured process
From records to next steps.
No particular result can be promised. The purpose of a review is to understand the facts and explain available options.
- 01
Gather
Collect relevant dates, transaction references, and account records.
- 02
Review
Assess what the records show and where important gaps remain.
- 03
Explain
Summarize findings and clarify the limits of the available evidence.
- 04
Consider
Discuss practical next steps before deciding whether to proceed.
How an investigation is structured
Facts, context, and careful interpretation.
Analysis is useful when it answers a defined question. We connect the technical records to the circumstances you describe, while keeping observation separate from inference.
Protect the source material
We identify the records that may matter—such as transaction hashes, wallet addresses, platform notices, messages, and payment receipts—and help organize them with dates and context. Original files should be preserved where possible so that later review is not based only on cropped or rewritten copies.
Build a consistent timeline
Transaction activity is considered alongside the reported sequence of events. Amounts, timestamps, address relationships, account activity, and communications may help confirm part of a timeline, expose a discrepancy, or show where additional records are needed.
State what the data can support
Findings distinguish directly observable activity from an interpretation or an unanswered question. A public address does not, by itself, identify its owner or establish intent, and an apparent service interaction is not proof that the service controls a particular person.
A useful outcome
A record you can work with.
Depending on the agreed scope and source material, the work may include a dated chronology, transaction-flow explanation, evidence index, and a written summary of limitations and next steps.
What an investigation can do
Clarify the sequence of observable transactions, organize records, identify inconsistencies, and help you prepare questions or reports for the appropriate provider or authority.
What it cannot promise
Blockchain analysis cannot reverse a transaction, freeze a wallet, compel an exchange to disclose information, or guarantee that funds or a specific identity will be found.
Who may need to act
Exchange operators, wallet providers, banks, law-enforcement agencies, and courts each follow their own processes. We can help you understand the available evidence; their decisions remain their own.